0

TutorMatch Pro — Online tutoring marketplace

AI deployment blueprint for Online tutoring marketplace. Automates tutor matching using Stripe, Twilio, Google Calendar, Claude.

3 agents4 integrations12h freed/week4-6 weeks for Smart Tutor Matcher7h setupSimple

AI Readiness Score

72/100
RUN
data maturity68

Has tutor profiles and session data, but quality metrics need development

team capacity65

Small team but technically capable with existing Claude integration

budget alignment80

Budget range appropriate for proposed automation scope

automation readiness75

Clear matching criteria and structured tutoring workflows make automation viable

timeline feasibility75

3-6 month timeline realistic for phased implementation

integration complexity70

Good API coverage with Stripe, Twilio, and Google Calendar

How This System Works

Architecture

Event-driven system with reactive matching, proactive monitoring, and automated dispute resolution. Smart Tutor Matcher responds to student requests with AI-powered compatibility analysis. Session Quality Monitor runs daily analysis to identify at-risk relationships. Payment Dispute Resolver handles Stripe webhooks with contextual session data analysis.

Data Flow

Student requests trigger the Smart Tutor Matcher which analyzes profiles and calendar availability to generate ranked matches. Session Quality Monitor processes daily data to identify trends and send alerts via Twilio. Payment disputes from Stripe are automatically analyzed against session evidence to provide resolution recommendations.

Implementation Phases

1
Smart Matching Foundation4-5 weeks

Implement automated tutor-student matching with basic compatibility scoring

Smart Tutor Matcher
2
Quality Monitoring3-4 weeks

Add proactive session quality monitoring and alerting system

Session Quality Monitor
3
Dispute Automation3-4 weeks

Automate payment dispute analysis and resolution recommendations

Payment Dispute Resolver

Prerequisites

  • -Structured tutor profiles with expertise and teaching style data
  • -Session tracking and feedback collection system
  • -Stripe webhook configuration

Assumptions

  • -Tutors maintain updated Google Calendar availability
  • -Students provide accurate learning preferences
  • -Session completion and quality data is consistently recorded

Recommended Agents (3)

How It Works

  1. 1
    Receive student matching request

    Student submits subject, level, preferred schedule, learning style

    webhook
  2. 2
    Query available tutors

    Filter by subject expertise and Google Calendar availability

    database
  3. 3
    Calculate compatibility scores

    Analyze teaching style match, experience level, and past student feedback

    Claude
  4. 4
    Return ranked matches

    Top 3-5 tutor recommendations with match confidence scores

    API

Data Flow

Inputs
  • student_profileSubject, level, schedule preferences, learning style(JSON)
  • tutor_profilesExpertise, availability, teaching style, ratings(JSON)
  • google_calendarReal-time tutor availability(API)
Outputs
  • matching_apiRanked tutor matches with confidence scores(JSON)

Prerequisites

  • -Structured tutor profiles
  • -Student preference data collection

Error Handling

warning
No available tutors

Suggest waitlist and alternative subjects

error
Calendar API failure

Fall back to cached availability data

Integrations

SourceTargetData FlowMethodComplexity
Smart Tutor MatcherGoogle Calendartutor availability lookupapilow
Session Quality MonitorTwilioalert notificationsapilow
Payment Dispute ResolverStripedispute data and responseswebhookmoderate
All AgentsInternal Databasesession and user datadirectlow

Schedule

0 9 * * *
Session Quality MonitorDaily quality analysis at 9 AM EST

Recommended Models

TaskRecommendedAlternativesEst. CostWhy
Tutor-student compatibility analysisClaude Sonnet 4
GPT-4o
$40-50/monthComplex reasoning required for multi-factor matching with nuanced teaching style analysis
Session quality pattern detectionClaude Haiku
GPT-4o mini
$15-20/monthStructured data analysis with clear patterns, cost-effective for daily processing
Dispute evidence analysisClaude Sonnet 4
GPT-4o
$25-30/monthRequires careful reasoning about evidence and context for financial decisions

Impact

What Changes

Before
Manual review of each student request against tutor profiles
After
Automated matching with confidence scores and reasoning
Before
Reactive response to student complaints about session quality
After
Proactive intervention based on early warning signals
Before
Hours spent investigating each payment dispute manually
After
Instant analysis with evidence-backed resolution recommendations
Capacity Unlocked
Operations team can focus on strategic growth and complex relationship management instead of routine matching and dispute resolution
Time to First Impact
4-6 weeks for Smart Tutor Matcher

Quality Gains

  • More accurate tutor-student matches leading to better learning outcomes
  • Proactive identification of quality issues before student churn
  • Faster dispute resolution improving platform trust
12h freed up/week$155/mo estimated cost

Similar Blueprints

What's next?

This blueprint is a starting point. Fork it, remix it, or build your own.