AI Readiness Score
Case data exists but not structured for automation
Lawyers are non-technical
Strong budget for scope
Clear intake bottleneck
6-month timeline is comfortable
Legal tools have limited APIs
How This System Works
Architecture
The Morrison & Associates AI deployment implements a two-stage client onboarding pipeline designed to streamline legal intake processes. The system operates as a reactive workflow where new client inquiries trigger automated screening and conflict checking procedures. The Intake Screener agent serves as the primary gatekeeper, leveraging Claude AI to analyze potential cases against practice area expertise and merit criteria before routing qualified leads to the Conflict Checker. The architecture follows a hub-and-spoke model with HubSpot as the central CRM orchestrating data flow between systems. OAuth-secured API integrations ensure seamless data transfer from initial contact through case management, with Clio serving as the authoritative legal practice management system. This design minimizes manual intervention while maintaining compliance with legal industry standards for client confidentiality and conflict management.
Data Flow
Client inquiries originate through web forms, phone calls, or referral channels and are captured in HubSpot as new contact records with case details. The Intake Screener immediately processes this data, analyzing case descriptions, legal issues, and client circumstances against predefined practice area criteria using Claude AI's natural language processing capabilities. Qualified cases receive enriched data tags and priority scores before advancing to the next stage. Approved cases trigger the Conflict Checker, which extracts client and opposing party information from HubSpot and cross-references this data against Clio's existing client database. The system performs comprehensive name matching, business entity searches, and relationship analysis to identify potential conflicts of interest. Results are automatically logged back to HubSpot with disposition codes, enabling attorneys to make informed acceptance decisions while maintaining a complete audit trail of the screening process.
Implementation Phases
Establish API connections, authentication, and basic data flow between HubSpot and Clio systems
Implement and configure the Intake Screener agent with Claude integration and practice area criteria
Deploy conflict checking automation with comprehensive database cross-referencing capabilities
End-to-end testing, workflow refinement, and staff training on the automated intake system
Prerequisites
- -Active HubSpot Professional or Enterprise subscription with API access
- -Clio Manage subscription with API permissions enabled
- -Claude AI API access and usage credits
- -SSL certificates for secure API communications
- -Internal network firewall configurations for external API calls
- -Staff training on manual override procedures
Assumptions
- -HubSpot contains standardized intake form fields for case information
- -Clio database has comprehensive client and matter records
- -Practice areas and case merit criteria are well-defined and documentable
- -Legal staff will review agent decisions before final client acceptance
- -Existing intake volume justifies automation investment
- -Client confidentiality protocols permit cloud-based AI processing
Recommended Agents (2)
How It Works
- 1Monitor HubSpot Webhooks
Listen for new contact creation events from HubSpot webhooks, capturing inquiry details including case description, legal issues, client contact information, and urgency indicators
HubSpot Webhooks API - 2Extract Case Details
Parse incoming contact record to extract relevant fields including case_description, legal_area, opposing_party, damages_claimed, and statute_of_limitations_concerns from HubSpot custom properties
HubSpot Contacts API - 3Analyze Case Merit
Submit structured case information to Claude AI with firm-specific prompts to evaluate practice area fit, case strength, potential damages, and resource requirements against predefined acceptance criteria
Claude API - 4Generate Screening Decision
Process Claude's analysis to assign qualification scores (1-10), identify required follow-up actions, flag high-priority cases, and create structured recommendations for attorney review
Claude API - 5Update Client Record
Write screening results back to HubSpot including qualification_score, practice_area_match, merit_assessment, and next_action_required fields, then trigger workflow for qualified cases
HubSpot Contacts API
Implementation
# Intake Screener Implementation
## Project Structure
```
intake_screener/
├── app.py
├── config/
│ ├── settings.py
│ └── criteria.yaml
├── handlers/
│ ├── hubspot_handler.py
│ ├── claude_handler.py
│ └── screening_engine.py
├── templates/
│ └── screening_prompts.py
└── requirements.txt
```
## Environment Variables (.env)
```
HUBSPOT_API_KEY=your_hubspot_key
CLAUDE_API_KEY=your_claude_key
WEBHOOK_SECRET=your_webhook_secret
FLASK_SECRET_KEY=random_secret
```
## Main Application (app.py)
```python
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
from handlers.hubspot_handler import HubSpotClient
from handlers.claude_handler import ClaudeAnalyzer
from handlers.screening_engine import ScreeningEngine
app = Flask(__name__)
hubspot = HubSpotClient()
claude = ClaudeAnalyzer()
screener = ScreeningEngine(hubspot, claude)
@app.route('/webhook/hubspot', methods=['POST'])
def hubspot_webhook():
data = request.json
if data.get('subscriptionType') == 'contact.creation':
contact_id = data['objectId']
return screener.process_new_inquiry(contact_id)
return jsonify({'status': 'ignored'})
if __name__ == '__main__':
app.run(host='0.0.0.0', port=5000)
```
## Deployment
1. Install dependencies: `pip install -r requirements.txt`
2. Configure HubSpot webhook pointing to `/webhook/hubspot`
3. Set up criteria.yaml with practice area definitions
4. Deploy with gunicorn: `gunicorn -w 4 -b 0.0.0.0:5000 app:app`
5. Configure reverse proxy (nginx) for SSL terminationData Flow
Inputs
- HubSpot — New contact records with intake form data including case_description, legal_area, client_name, phone, email(JSON webhook payload)
- Web forms — Client-submitted case details, contact information, and initial consultation requests(HubSpot form submissions)
Outputs
- HubSpot — Updated contact records with qualification_score, merit_assessment, practice_area_match, screening_notes(HubSpot contact properties JSON)
- Conflict Checker — Qualified case information for conflict analysis including client names and opposing parties(Internal system trigger)
Prerequisites
- -HubSpot webhook endpoint configured for contact creation events
- -Claude AI API key with sufficient usage credits
- -Custom HubSpot properties defined for screening results
- -Practice area criteria and acceptance guidelines documented
- -SSL certificate for secure webhook reception
Error Handling
Queue request for retry with exponential backoff, flag record for manual review
Log security event, reject request, alert administrator
Flag for follow-up call, assign low priority score, request additional details
Store results locally, retry update, escalate to manual processing
Integrations
| Source | Target | Data Flow | Method | Complexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpot | Clio | Client records for conflict check | api | complex |
Recommended Models
| Task | Recommended | Alternatives | Est. Cost | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agent logic / orchestration | Claude Sonnet 4 | GPT-4oGemini 2.5 Pro | $0.003-0.015/call | Complex legal reasoning for case merit evaluation and client pre-qualification requires sophisticated decision-making capabilities |
| Data extraction / parsing | Claude Haiku | GPT-4o-miniGemini 2.0 Flash | $0.0002-0.001/call | Fast extraction of client information from intake forms and legal documents for database cross-referencing |
| Classification / routing | Claude Haiku | Gemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o-mini | $0.0002-0.001/call | Efficient classification of legal practice areas and routing of qualified leads to appropriate workflows |
| Content generation | Claude Sonnet 4 | GPT-4oClaude Opus 4 | $0.003-0.015/call | Generate professional client communications and legal intake summaries requiring accuracy and appropriate tone |
| Embeddings / search | Gemini 2.0 Flash | GPT-4o-miniClaude Haiku | $0.0001-0.001/call | High-volume semantic search across client databases for conflict checking and case similarity matching |
Impact
What Changes
Quality Gains
- ✓Zero missed conflicts — systematic cross-reference eliminates oversight risk
- ✓Intake qualification accuracy improves to 100% — no unsuitable cases slip through
- ✓Response time to qualified leads drops from 2–3 days to same-day
Similar Blueprints
Contract Review & Extraction
An AI-powered contract review system that automatically analyzes contracts uploaded to Clio or Google Drive, extracting key clauses, assessing risks, checking compliance, and generating comprehensive review reports. The system reduces associate review time from 4 hours to approximately 1 hour per contract while improving consistency and accuracy. Integration with existing tools ensures seamless workflow adoption without disrupting current practices.
Client Intake & Conflict Check
An automated client intake and conflict checking system that processes PDF intake forms from emails, extracts client information, performs comprehensive conflict checks across multiple databases, and manages the complete intake workflow. The system ensures compliance with legal ethics while dramatically reducing manual administrative work and improving client onboarding speed. Integration with Clio and LawPay enables seamless client record creation and payment processing.
DisputeResolve Mediation — Alternative dispute resolution firm
AI deployment blueprint for Alternative dispute resolution firm. Automates mediation ops using Google Calendar, Zoom, DocuSign, Claude.
PatentGuard IP — Patent prosecution boutique
AI deployment blueprint for Patent prosecution boutique. Automates patent prosecution using Airtable, Gmail, Google Drive, Claude.
What's next?
This blueprint is a starting point. Fork it, remix it, or build your own.