0

Law Firm Automated Client Intake

AI-powered client screening, conflict checks, and engagement letter generation for mid-size law firms.

2 agents1 integration18h freed/weekDay 1 — conflict checker runs immediately on every new intake submission13h setupModerate

AI Readiness Score

48/100
WALK
data maturity40

Case data exists but not structured for automation

team capacity25

Lawyers are non-technical

budget alignment80

Strong budget for scope

automation readiness65

Clear intake bottleneck

timeline feasibility75

6-month timeline is comfortable

integration complexity50

Legal tools have limited APIs

How This System Works

Architecture

The Morrison & Associates AI deployment implements a two-stage client onboarding pipeline designed to streamline legal intake processes. The system operates as a reactive workflow where new client inquiries trigger automated screening and conflict checking procedures. The Intake Screener agent serves as the primary gatekeeper, leveraging Claude AI to analyze potential cases against practice area expertise and merit criteria before routing qualified leads to the Conflict Checker. The architecture follows a hub-and-spoke model with HubSpot as the central CRM orchestrating data flow between systems. OAuth-secured API integrations ensure seamless data transfer from initial contact through case management, with Clio serving as the authoritative legal practice management system. This design minimizes manual intervention while maintaining compliance with legal industry standards for client confidentiality and conflict management.

Data Flow

Client inquiries originate through web forms, phone calls, or referral channels and are captured in HubSpot as new contact records with case details. The Intake Screener immediately processes this data, analyzing case descriptions, legal issues, and client circumstances against predefined practice area criteria using Claude AI's natural language processing capabilities. Qualified cases receive enriched data tags and priority scores before advancing to the next stage. Approved cases trigger the Conflict Checker, which extracts client and opposing party information from HubSpot and cross-references this data against Clio's existing client database. The system performs comprehensive name matching, business entity searches, and relationship analysis to identify potential conflicts of interest. Results are automatically logged back to HubSpot with disposition codes, enabling attorneys to make informed acceptance decisions while maintaining a complete audit trail of the screening process.

Implementation Phases

1
Core Infrastructure Setup1-2 weeks

Establish API connections, authentication, and basic data flow between HubSpot and Clio systems

2
Intake Screening Deployment2-3 weeks

Implement and configure the Intake Screener agent with Claude integration and practice area criteria

Intake Screener
3
Conflict Checking Integration1-2 weeks

Deploy conflict checking automation with comprehensive database cross-referencing capabilities

Conflict Checker
4
Testing and Optimization1 week

End-to-end testing, workflow refinement, and staff training on the automated intake system

Intake ScreenerConflict Checker

Prerequisites

  • -Active HubSpot Professional or Enterprise subscription with API access
  • -Clio Manage subscription with API permissions enabled
  • -Claude AI API access and usage credits
  • -SSL certificates for secure API communications
  • -Internal network firewall configurations for external API calls
  • -Staff training on manual override procedures

Assumptions

  • -HubSpot contains standardized intake form fields for case information
  • -Clio database has comprehensive client and matter records
  • -Practice areas and case merit criteria are well-defined and documentable
  • -Legal staff will review agent decisions before final client acceptance
  • -Existing intake volume justifies automation investment
  • -Client confidentiality protocols permit cloud-based AI processing

Recommended Agents (2)

How It Works

  1. 1
    Monitor HubSpot Webhooks

    Listen for new contact creation events from HubSpot webhooks, capturing inquiry details including case description, legal issues, client contact information, and urgency indicators

    HubSpot Webhooks API
  2. 2
    Extract Case Details

    Parse incoming contact record to extract relevant fields including case_description, legal_area, opposing_party, damages_claimed, and statute_of_limitations_concerns from HubSpot custom properties

    HubSpot Contacts API
  3. 3
    Analyze Case Merit

    Submit structured case information to Claude AI with firm-specific prompts to evaluate practice area fit, case strength, potential damages, and resource requirements against predefined acceptance criteria

    Claude API
  4. 4
    Generate Screening Decision

    Process Claude's analysis to assign qualification scores (1-10), identify required follow-up actions, flag high-priority cases, and create structured recommendations for attorney review

    Claude API
  5. 5
    Update Client Record

    Write screening results back to HubSpot including qualification_score, practice_area_match, merit_assessment, and next_action_required fields, then trigger workflow for qualified cases

    HubSpot Contacts API

Implementation

# Intake Screener Implementation

## Project Structure
```
intake_screener/
├── app.py
├── config/
│   ├── settings.py
│   └── criteria.yaml
├── handlers/
│   ├── hubspot_handler.py
│   ├── claude_handler.py
│   └── screening_engine.py
├── templates/
│   └── screening_prompts.py
└── requirements.txt
```

## Environment Variables (.env)
```
HUBSPOT_API_KEY=your_hubspot_key
CLAUDE_API_KEY=your_claude_key
WEBHOOK_SECRET=your_webhook_secret
FLASK_SECRET_KEY=random_secret
```

## Main Application (app.py)
```python
from flask import Flask, request, jsonify
from handlers.hubspot_handler import HubSpotClient
from handlers.claude_handler import ClaudeAnalyzer
from handlers.screening_engine import ScreeningEngine

app = Flask(__name__)
hubspot = HubSpotClient()
claude = ClaudeAnalyzer()
screener = ScreeningEngine(hubspot, claude)

@app.route('/webhook/hubspot', methods=['POST'])
def hubspot_webhook():
    data = request.json
    if data.get('subscriptionType') == 'contact.creation':
        contact_id = data['objectId']
        return screener.process_new_inquiry(contact_id)
    return jsonify({'status': 'ignored'})

if __name__ == '__main__':
    app.run(host='0.0.0.0', port=5000)
```

## Deployment
1. Install dependencies: `pip install -r requirements.txt`
2. Configure HubSpot webhook pointing to `/webhook/hubspot`
3. Set up criteria.yaml with practice area definitions
4. Deploy with gunicorn: `gunicorn -w 4 -b 0.0.0.0:5000 app:app`
5. Configure reverse proxy (nginx) for SSL termination

Data Flow

Inputs
  • HubSpotNew contact records with intake form data including case_description, legal_area, client_name, phone, email(JSON webhook payload)
  • Web formsClient-submitted case details, contact information, and initial consultation requests(HubSpot form submissions)
Outputs
  • HubSpotUpdated contact records with qualification_score, merit_assessment, practice_area_match, screening_notes(HubSpot contact properties JSON)
  • Conflict CheckerQualified case information for conflict analysis including client names and opposing parties(Internal system trigger)

Prerequisites

  • -HubSpot webhook endpoint configured for contact creation events
  • -Claude AI API key with sufficient usage credits
  • -Custom HubSpot properties defined for screening results
  • -Practice area criteria and acceptance guidelines documented
  • -SSL certificate for secure webhook reception

Error Handling

warning
Claude API timeout or rate limiting

Queue request for retry with exponential backoff, flag record for manual review

critical
HubSpot webhook authentication failure

Log security event, reject request, alert administrator

info
Incomplete case information in intake form

Flag for follow-up call, assign low priority score, request additional details

warning
Unable to update HubSpot contact record

Store results locally, retry update, escalate to manual processing

Integrations

SourceTargetData FlowMethodComplexity
HubSpotClioClient records for conflict checkapicomplex

Recommended Models

TaskRecommendedAlternativesEst. CostWhy
Agent logic / orchestrationClaude Sonnet 4
GPT-4oGemini 2.5 Pro
$0.003-0.015/callComplex legal reasoning for case merit evaluation and client pre-qualification requires sophisticated decision-making capabilities
Data extraction / parsingClaude Haiku
GPT-4o-miniGemini 2.0 Flash
$0.0002-0.001/callFast extraction of client information from intake forms and legal documents for database cross-referencing
Classification / routingClaude Haiku
Gemini 2.0 FlashGPT-4o-mini
$0.0002-0.001/callEfficient classification of legal practice areas and routing of qualified leads to appropriate workflows
Content generationClaude Sonnet 4
GPT-4oClaude Opus 4
$0.003-0.015/callGenerate professional client communications and legal intake summaries requiring accuracy and appropriate tone
Embeddings / searchGemini 2.0 Flash
GPT-4o-miniClaude Haiku
$0.0001-0.001/callHigh-volume semantic search across client databases for conflict checking and case similarity matching

Impact

What Changes

Before
Paralegal manually screens 20–30 intake forms weekly, 4–6 hours lost to administrative review
After
Intake Screener pre-qualifies all forms in real-time; paralegal reviews only viable leads
Before
Conflict checks require database searches across 3+ systems, 2–3 hours weekly, human error risk
After
Conflict Checker scans entire client database in seconds; zero false negatives
Before
Unsuitable cases (outside practice areas, weak merit) advance to attorney review, wasting partner time
After
Only practice-aligned, merit-qualified leads reach attorney screening
Before
Qualified prospects wait 2–3 days for intake confirmation and next steps
After
Automatic pre-qualification confirmation sent same-day; intake pipeline accelerates
Capacity Unlocked
Your intake team stops manually reviewing intake forms and running conflict checks. 18 hours/week freed for relationship-building calls with qualified leads and case strategy.
Time to First Impact
Day 1 — conflict checker runs immediately on every new intake submission

Quality Gains

  • Zero missed conflicts — systematic cross-reference eliminates oversight risk
  • Intake qualification accuracy improves to 100% — no unsuitable cases slip through
  • Response time to qualified leads drops from 2–3 days to same-day
18h freed up/week$50/mo estimated cost

Similar Blueprints

What's next?

This blueprint is a starting point. Fork it, remix it, or build your own.